Furthermore, I likely would never have purchased Nikon’s 20mm, but it’s the more comparable lens available.Ģ8mm Once again APS-C gets an “N/A” rating. Prime Lenses Focal LengthĢ4mm APS-C gets an “N/A” rating for “Nothing Appropriate.” I could be cheeky, and add the 14mm f/2.8D at 670g, but I wouldn’t even have bought that lens for FX, let alone DX. With that written, the 16-35 weighs in at 680g, or 50% more than the 10-24mm f/4. That’s why I’m ok to with what I currently have in the table. The reality is the 10-24mm f/4 has even better distortion characteristics than the 14-24mm does. After correction and cropping I think that lens was really closer to 17 or 18mm. Well, I never bought the 16-35mm because the distortion was so bad. Some of you are probably ready to take me to task on having the 14-24mm in there instead of the 16-35mm, which is arguably a more similarly spec’d lens. I’ve included those numbers, but realistically, you likely wouldn’t be traveling with a “heavy duty” support system unless it’s your job. People using a BH-55 and Series 3 setup will notice even greater weight savings. Now that I’m mirrorless, I can easily get away with the lighter and significantly more compact TQC-14 Series 1 tripod and matching BH-30 ballhead. I chose the best ratio of weight to support for me, Really Right Stuff’s Versa Series 2 tripod and BH-40 ballhead. When putting together a tripod and ballhead package for my DSLR kit, weight was a huge concern for me as the rest of my pack was already pretty heavy. A lighter camera won’t make a better photo, but a camera that’s light enough for you to want to have with you will make a much better photo than the DSLR you left at home because it’s too big and heavy. It just so happens that, provided I can get comparable image quality, weight is something I am very interested in reducing. I added what I felt I could with reasonable accuracy from the Canon side of things.Īnd finally, before we get into it, I want to state up front that this doesn’t mean mirrorless cameras are better than DSLRs overall. You also might not be coming from Nikon, but if you’re a Canon shooter, I suspect you can draw very similar comparisons. You might not buy the same stuff I do, and you almost certainly won’t have the exact same DSLR kit as I did, but the weight differences are likely to be similar. I should note that this is obviously a highly subjective comparison. In this article, I’ll paint a picture of just how much weight can be saved by moving from a full frame DSLR kit to a mirrorless one. 1 After a couple years of 8+ hour hikes with a DSLR kit on my back, and mirrorless cameras a viable alternative, it was time to downsize. When building up my DSLR kit, heavy gear was inevitable if I wanted to use the best optics available on the platform. Size and weight has become a primary criterion for me with camera gear. 6.1 for X-Trans Best X-Trans RAW Converter Long Exposure Photography Tips Heavy Issues Mirrorless vs DSLR weight Adobe’s Fujifilm Camera Calibration Profiles Film Simulation Modes Compared Fujifilm Metering ONA Bowery vs. Extras Fuji Filter Thread Sizes Lightroom 5.7 vs.Reviews Fujifilm X-T3 Fujifilm X-H1 Fujifilm X-T2 Fujifilm X-Pro2 Fujifilm X-T1 Fujifilm X-T10 Fujifilm X70 Fujifilm X30 Fujifilm GFX 50S Preview XF 14mm F2.8 XF 16mm F1.4 WR XF 18mm F2 XF 23mm F1.4 XF 35mm F1.4 XF 35mm F2 WR XF 56mm F1.2 (APD) XF 10-24mm F4 OIS XF 16-55mm F2.8 WR XF 18-55mm F2.8-4 OIS XF 50-140mm F2.8 OIS WR MCEX-11 & MCEX-16 Extension Tubes VPB-XT2 Vertical Power Booster Grip Fuji MHG-XT Hand Grip Artisan & Artist Silk Strap LumaLabs Loop 3 Nucis Leather Straps.Lens Versus Wide Angle Primes Standard Zooms Telephoto Zooms 10-24mm F4 vs.X20 Interchangeable Lens Body Spec Comparison Fixed Lens Body Spec Comparison Heavy Issues Mirrorless vs DSLR weight - Fuji vs.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |